From data to decision
How Castwise turns fishing data into a decision
Other fishing apps give you the data. Castwise tells you what to do with it. Castwise is rolled out across the UK and ready to use for shore-fishing planning wherever you fish. A deterministic engine turns mark data and live marine conditions into transparent species and session recommendations, then AI explains the result in plain English.
Score versus confidence
Castwise separates three questions. Fishing potential is the raw 0–100 match between species, mark and conditions. The recommendation score is fishing potential after transparent safety penalties. Confidence describes the completeness and quality of the evidence behind the result; it is not the chance of catching.
A mark can have strong fishing potential but rank lower because exposed swell, strong wind, darkness or tide-cut-off adds risk. A result can also have lower confidence when mark detail is estimated or forecast inputs are stale. Both cases tell you why extra checking is required.
How safety changes a recommendation
Every detected concern is listed with its reason and a practical action. High-risk marks can remain recommendable, but they receive point penalties and require an explicit acknowledgement before planning, directions or starting a session. Critical conditions — or missing essential weather, marine or tide data — make a result non-recommendable. Extreme air temperature is still shown as an exposure warning, but it does not reduce the score because it does not distinguish nearby marks; sea temperature remains part of species suitability.
How it learns over time
The engine is deterministic, but it is not static. Your logbook builds a private picture of the baits, rigs, tides, ground and seasons behind your own results. When community contribution is enabled, completed catches and blanks can also enter thresholded aggregate learning. No aggregate bucket is published below eight sessions from five anglers, and private mark IDs or private region labels do not enter public mark or regional statistics. Community evidence nudges and calibrates the model; it does not replace the factor breakdown.